28 Mar BMC aids innovations in fellow feedback that may improve abilities and you can conserve peer reviewers’ time and energy
Between BMC or other editors/third parties

Some BMC guides will think manuscripts from other writers. We're also ready to imagine manuscripts which were reviewed of the businesses. But not, submission off a book having reviewer profile out of a special log otherwise a separate opinion service does not mean that it will be immediately recognized of the choosing journal and additional fellow comment will get be needed.
Confidentiality
Writers have a tendency to treat every manuscripts published to all of the BMC guides into the trust. BMC adheres to COPE's Moral Assistance to own Fellow Writers. Reviewers are therefore required to admiration the new confidentiality of the fellow feedback process rather than inform you people details of a novel otherwise their remark, during the otherwise following the peer-review process, outside of the pointers put out by the journal. When the reviewers want to include a colleague on opinion processes they must basic obtain permission throughout the log. New Editor is informed of the brands of any individuals who assisted about opinion procedure if report was returned.
BMC will not show manuscripts with third parties outside of BMC but from inside the instances of suspected misconduct. Find our Misconduct plan for more information. Manuscripts could be distributed to other Publishers at the BMC, until people imply into submitting that they do not desire for the manuscript are passed on outside the record they registered in order to. Discover portability of peer opinion for more information.
BMC frequently undertakes studies built to assist in improving techniques for people, writers and you may writers, and how science was communicated inside our magazines.